Sophie Turner

Zexters Looboratory

Well-Known Member
Nah it’s way too low quality to show that from just zooming in. I mean even when downloading the pic, zooming in/cropping it, increasing brilliance and maxing brightness and shadows you clearly see that no pussy lip is showing and how few pixels there are/how poor the quality of the photo is. The enhanced pic above showing clearly visible pussy is of far too good of a quality with its sharp features where there are non in the original photo for it not to be AI enhanced. But if you wanna believe it’s really just a brightened pic showing that much of her pussy then whatever helps you wank at night, brother ☺️
Fuck ai man
 

piffpaffpuff

Well-Known Member
Nah it’s way too low quality to show that from just zooming in. I mean even when downloading the pic, zooming in/cropping it, increasing brilliance and maxing brightness and shadows you clearly see that no pussy lip is showing and how few pixels there are/how poor the quality of the photo is. The enhanced pic above showing clearly visible pussy is of far too good of a quality with its sharp features where there are non in the original photo for it not to be AI enhanced. But if you wanna believe it’s really just a brightened pic showing that much of her pussy then whatever helps you wank at night, brother ☺️
agreed, opened it in lightroom and it's literally 13 pixels across... no chance of that much detail
 

Fappémon

Active Member
This forum is becoming more and more like a bloody digital imaging website every day
Just post the damn pictures and stop it with the bloody forensic shit of every picture
I agree in general, but posting a picture that is AI enhanced to the point of showing stuff that isn’t there and claiming it’s only zoomed in or brightened is basically the same as posting a fake. There is a fakes section for that on this very forum, and I stand by correcting this bs.
 
Last edited:

Pedro83

Well-Known Member
I agree in general, but posting a picture that is AI enhanced to the point of showing stuff that isn't there and claiming it's only zoomed in or brightened is basically the same as posting a fake. There is a fakes section for that on this very forum, and I stand by correcting this bs.
One more time for the idiots. I never claimed the picture wasn't enhanced. I was very clear that I, the person who lightened and zoomed, had not used any ai. Whether or not it had been done before by someone else and the picture I used was enhanced was not something I could say.
If you are so desperate to call out BS, please be accurate when you do. Now, I'll accept your apology without you having to type it and waste more space on the forum, but please, be better moving forward.
 

Fappémon

Active Member
One more time for the idiots. I never claimed the picture wasn't enhanced. I was very clear that I, the person who lightened and zoomed, had not used any ai. Whether or not it had been done before by someone else and the picture I used was enhanced was not something I could say.
If you are so desperate to call out BS, please be accurate when you do. Now, I'll accept your apology without you having to type it and waste more space on the forum, but please, be better moving forward.
One last time, then maybe we can both finally stop bumping this thread? Because I hope you realise this is twice now that you yourself have commented, without adding any content, that people need to stop commenting unless they add any content.

Perhaps I replied to the wrong comment then but if you read what I wrote my only point is that the pic is AI edited and might as well be a fake. If that isn’t your doing then stop taking my criticism to heart and feeling attacked. I have no beef with you brother, now let’s not bump this anymore ok.
 
Thread starter Similar threads Forum Replies Date
Erasmus4822 Celebrity Sexy Photos 0
R Other Models 0
Wanxbanx4days Fake Celebrity Nude and Deepfakes 0
C Celebrity Leaked Photos 108
B Celebrity Sexy Photos 238
Top